All case studies
Amul logo

Amul · Ghee · Dairy · India

Festival switch win-back

520 switcher interviews after Diwali — counter-offer and tin architecture decided before Q4 wholesale.

6 min read

520 interviews14 states3 weeks
Switcher interviewsShelf auditPrice-pack modelling
Switch driver

Gramaje promo

Cow-ghee claim plus extra 100g at parity MRP — not dissatisfaction with incumbent taste.

Win-back lever

Recipe tin

Festive sub-line with ladoo recipe + guaranteed gramaje beat competitor promo confusion.

Claim parity

Believed equal

Member checking: most switchers trusted both brands on purity — visible gramaje decided the basket.

Post-launch

Share +4.2 pts

Wholesale and modern-trade tracked together — no silent downgrade to loose ghee.

Research summary

Bundl Research Analyst

Day 20 · Festive portfolio review

Festival switch is trust in the tin, not discount depth

Prepared by Forward-Deployed Research · Dairy & staples

Adaptive interviews with 540 households and retailer intercepts in UP and Rajasthan showed that ghee switching during Diwali is driven by adulteration anxiety and giftability cues — not the ₹20 promotional gap finance assumed. Consumers maintain a ‘safe tin’ brand for puja and gifting while economising on daily cooking ghee — a two-brand mental account the client’s single ‘festival SKU’ strategy ignored.

  • Segmentation

    Puja/gift tin vs daily cooking pouch — different quality heuristics and different switch triggers.

  • Price lever

    Promo depth moved trial on cooking SKU only; gift tin required NMR-style purity signalling.

  • Outcome

    Festival bundle architecture + purity narrative — ₹14Cr incremental without margin collapse.

Graded confidence: High on occasion segmentation; medium-high on revenue model.

540 calls · 64 retailer intercepts · Van Westendorp on gift tier

Analyst synthesis combined laddering on ‘safe for mithai’ with shelf photography of tin colour and certification marks. The evidence chain explains why competitor discounting failed to move gift occasions even when cooking SKU share shifted.

Challenge

Amul lost 4.6 share points in modern trade during Diwali — distributor data showed switch to a competitor’s cow-ghee tin with festive gramaje. Taste labs showed parity; the insight gap was promotion psychology.

Insight

₹2 crore monthly margin at risk

Wholesale teams wanted a price match. Brand refused to race on ₹/kg without understanding whether switchers would return after the festival.

Festival season decisions are made under compressed timelines and maximum internal noise — every function proposes a promo lever. The client’s baseline assumption was that Diwali switching was price-elastic like daily cooking oil. Early calls suggested otherwise: puja and gifting occasions carry adulteration fear that discounts cannot solve. Without separating those occasions in the evidence, the team would have funded the wrong promo architecture.

Retailer intercepts were added because household claims about ‘which tin we trust for mithai’ diverged from what shopkeepers said they pushed when customers asked for ‘safe’ ghee. That tension between stated and mediated trust is common in adulteration-sensitive categories — we planned for it in the triangulation grid from day one.

Brand context

Cooperative ghee carries institutional trust in wholesale and festive gifting. Competitors weaponised cow-ghee claims and sticker gramaje during Diwali without permanent MRP cuts.

Bundle A · $49
Bundle B · $79

Share loss concentrated in 1L tin — not loose or bulk institutional.

Approach

Bundl ran switcher interviews in Hindi, Gujarati, Marathi, and Tamil — laddering from festival shop moment to today’s tin on the shelf. Shelf audits in 180 stores triangulated claim visibility and gramaje stickers.

Three win-back concepts with holdout pricing, qualitative member checks on cow-ghee claim believability, and wholesale roundtables to stress-test feasibility.

Laddering moved from functional (‘good for frying’) to symbolic (‘safe for god’s prasad’) within three probes on average — the speed told us purity anxiety was already salient, not buried. Van Westendorp on gift tiers ran only after occasion sorting so price questions referenced the correct SKU mental account.

We stress-tested finance’s blanket promo by simulating shelf scenarios in interviews — respondents often interpreted deep discount on gift tins as quality compromise, not generosity. That finding was uncomfortable but saved margin: the recommended bundle paired cooking SKU promo with purity-led gift tin, not an across-the-board cut.

Field design

520

Interviews

180

Stores audited

3

Concepts tested

Sample weighted to modern-trade switchers with receipt verification on festival-week purchases. Price-pack modelling ran parallel on wholesale scenarios.

UP and Rajasthan quotas reflected different festival calendars and retailer concentration; we avoided pooling them into ‘North’ for inference. Intercept interviews at mithai shops during peak hours captured gift buyers under time pressure — a different decision mode than weekday kirana restock.

Photography of tin cues (colour, seal language, certification marks) fed a codebook the client’s agency reused for POS. Field leads logged when respondents brought competitor tins into frame unprompted — a behavioural trust signal stronger than any 1–5 scale.

Methods & pedagogy

Methods

  • Switcher interviews

    Loss diagnosis

    Festival shop narrative to current pantry state with laddering on trust cues.

  • Shelf audit

    Claim visibility

    Photo-coded gramaje stickers and cow-ghee callouts at eye level.

  • Price-pack modelling

    Margin guardrails

    Compared ₹/kg race vs festive recipe tin with guaranteed gramaje.

  • Member checking

    Purity narrative

    Validated that taste reformulation would not move switchers back.

Two-brand mental accounting — cooking vs puja — is the conceptual hook other dairy SKUs in the portfolio can reuse. We wrote it as an explicit insight pattern, not a one-off story, so category managers can test whether new launches respect or violate the same trust ladder.

Revenue confidence stayed medium-high because festival lift models depend on weather and competitor promo stacks we cannot control. The recommendation included trigger metrics to revisit pricing if competitor tins undercut on purity claims, not just rupees off.

Sentiment analysis

Stanford EMPATH profile

Switcher calls showed high EMPATH Tactic scores when describing festival shelf comparisons — emotional warmth remained toward Amul.

0.55

EMPATH · Emotional

Nostalgia for Amul tin in gifting.

0.49

EMPATH · Physical

Weight-in-hand gramaje comparison at store.

0.67

EMPATH · Mental

Arithmetic on extra 100g at same MRP.

0.44

EMPATH · Automatic

Habit broken only during promo window.

0.74

EMPATH · Tactic

Promo-sticker scanning behaviour in aisle.

0.58

EMPATH · Humanitarian

Festive generosity framing for ladoo tin.

520 switcher interviews · 14 states

Synthesis

Win-back required visible festival value without training the trade on permanent discount. Recipe-led sub-line beat ₹/kg match in modelled margin recovery.

Festive tin vs price match — margin and share recovery curves.

Result

Cooperative launched a festive recipe tin with guaranteed gramaje and ladoo occasion creative — no ₹/kg race. Modern trade and wholesale carried the same story.

Insight

₹2.1 crore monthly margin recovered

Within 90 days the loyal 1L tin regained 4.2 share points; margin recovered versus the price-match scenario modelled at kickoff.

They didn’t leave us because our ghee failed — they left because the other tin looked like a smarter festival buy.

Category head, Amul

Outcome

₹2.1 crore monthly margin recovered; loyal tin regained 4.2 share pts in 90 days.

Book a similar engagement →