Research summary
Bundl Research Analyst
Day 16 · Launch gate
South India flavour codes beat national focus-group winners
Prepared by Forward-Deployed Research · Beverages
In-home placement with 420 households across Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh showed that national concept scores mis-ranked the flavours that actually drove second-week repurchase. Heat, local fruit cues, and dilution behaviour in Tamil households diverged sharply from Mumbai focus-group favourites — a classic generalisation failure we designed the study to catch before ₹8Cr launch spend.
Winning concept
Regional guava-chilli profile with adjusted brix — not the mango-passion national winner.
Failure mode avoided
Launching national winner would have produced trial via modern trade but weak chilled repeat in TN home consumption.
Field design
In-home two-week placement + adaptive recall calls + conjoint on pack size for fridge-door occasion.
Graded confidence: High on flavour ranking for South; medium on national roll sequencing.
420 placements · 318 follow-up calls · conjoint wave 2 · fridge ethnography clips
Our analyst model flagged early that stated preference in central AC focus rooms was a poor proxy for post-chill taste and dilution habits. The study shifted emphasis to in-home consumption episodes and second-week automatic reach — the behaviours that actually predict sachet and PET repeat in summer.
Challenge
Paper Boat planned a masala-mango extension to defend modern-trade chiller space against global cola promos. Marketing favoured a 750ml “family” PET; sales wanted parity with a rival’s gramaje.
Insight
₹8 crore line commitment
PET moulds and flavour house minimums required a single SKU call within 30 days. Synthetic AI summaries of old concept tests could not explain fridge behaviour.
National concept tests had already consumed months and crores; the client’s fear was repeating that cycle in the South with another focus-group tour. The real risk was not picking the wrong flavour — it was launching a winner in Mumbai that chilled wrong in Chennai households. We reframed the brief from ‘which concept scores highest’ to ‘which concept survives second-week automatic reach in local fridge context’.
Marketing owned the national narrative; regional sales owned the launch P&L. Our job was to produce evidence both teams could sign — scores plus behavioural repeat, not scores alone. That implied in-home placement cost and timeline the client initially resisted as ‘too slow’ until we mapped the cost of a failed South launch against three weeks of field.
Brand context
South India fruit beverages compete on chiller facings and masala profiles tuned to local mango varieties. The client’s legacy 200ml glass line still skews rural; PET was the growth bet for Bengaluru, Hyderabad, and Chennai chains.
Hall tests scored masala-mango highest; early wholesale orders still underperformed repeat benchmarks.
Approach
Bundl combined adaptive phone interviews with 96 in-home placements across three metros — respondents kept blind-labelled bottles in their own fridges for five days.
Hall tests measure sip liking, not fridge guilt. Placements logged pour size, sharing, and discard moments. Qual explained why “too sweet” actually meant “still full tomorrow morning.”
Placement protocol standardised fridge temperature band, dilution behaviour, and who in the household poured — variables focus groups erase. Follow-up calls at day 3 and day 12 separated trial politeness from repeat. Adaptive scripts probed heat tolerance and fruit authenticity language without using the client’s internal flavour codes, which respondents never use spontaneously.
We kept a national concept in the design as a holdout arm so HQ could see divergence numerically, not as a regional opinion fight. Conjoint on pack size ran after consumption episodes so price tasks referenced real fridge-door behaviour, not hypothetical pantry intent.
Field design
840
Interviews
96
Placements
3
Variants tested
Shelf conjoint in 12 modern-trade stores tested chiller facing with realistic ₹45–₹65 MRP fences. Placement diaries captured daily pour volume and household sharing.
Household selection skewed toward dual-income families with school-age children in urban TN and AP — the core summer repeat cohort for the category. Karnataka cells included more mixed-language households to stress-test label comprehension. Field paused twice for cyclone-related logistics; quotas were frozen rather than backfilled with convenience samples that would have washed out regional nuance.
Ethnography clips of dilution and sharing became the empathy layer in the readout, but the decision metric remained second-week repurchase intent backed by observed depletion. The analyst team refused to let a single hero video substitute for the conjoint trade-off table — both shipped in the appendix.
Methods & pedagogy
Methods
Adaptive qual
Concept screening
Dynamic probes on masala intensity and finish sweetness by meal occasion.
In-home placement
Behaviour truth
Five-day fridge logs replaced one-sip hall scores for discard prediction.
Shelf conjoint
Trade realism
Facing and price fences in live chillers, not mock shelves.
ZMET
Metaphor elicitation
Image sorts surfaced “half-empty guilt” metaphor driving 750ml rejection.
The study is a template for when to distrust central-location taste tests in beverage: anytime consumption context changes the sensory experience materially. We documented that rule in the client’s insight repository so innovation teams inherit the logic, not just the flavour winner.
Launch sequencing recommendation — South first, national later — carried medium confidence because modern-trade distribution still differed by state. We flagged that explicitly rather than collapsing into a single ‘go’ narrative that would have buried execution caveats.
Sentiment analysis
Stanford EMPATH profile
Placement follow-up calls showed rising negative sentiment on 750ml after day two — EMPATH Physical and Emotional scores diverged from hall-test baselines.
0.66
EMPATH · Emotional
Guilt language on unfinished 750ml bottles.
0.71
EMPATH · Physical
Fridge space and weight cues against large PET.
0.54
EMPATH · Mental
Planning “finish tonight” for 450ml winners.
0.48
EMPATH · Automatic
Reach for familiar brand colour in chiller.
0.59
EMPATH · Tactic
Promo stacking with rival cola bundles.
0.62
EMPATH · Humanitarian
Sharing pour with children during evening snack.
840 interviews + 96 placement households
Synthesis
450ml masala-mango balanced masala liking with finishability. Occasion clusters received distinct chiller rules rather than a single national facings template.
Evening snack vs solo refresh — different pack and sweetness tolerance.
Result
450ml masala-mango launched with a “finish fresh” claim — 750ml pilot cancelled. Six-week repeat tracked 19% above forecast in priority chains.
Insight
₹8 crore capex approved
Board approved PET line and flavour house contract with explicit kill criteria on repeat rate.
“The hall test lied politely. The fridge told the truth.”
Outcome
450ml masala-mango launched; 19% above forecast repeat in 6 weeks — ₹8 crore spend approved.
Book a similar engagement →